![]() ![]() Maybe it has to do with the application of the “very blurry” part? Though I don’t know about motion blur as unfortunately the program just crashed on me (!) (I used it as plugin to PS) and it is late, time to feed animals and get some wood in so my memory of the option terms might be a little off.īUT what I was seeing with the edges reminded me a little of problems I’ve had in the past manually (and misguidedly) in PS separating out subject and background, making inversed mask for background, getting it wrong about which direction to modify my mask for feathering, simplifying background and applying pseudo-lens blur and then trying to put it back together and somehow accidently misaligning the layers in the meantime. Similarly on “too soft”, very blurry and motion blurs messy offset - however on “too soft” very noisy and normal - no prob. Possibly this is all that is going on? Er…depending on how this software works but it seems to me it tries to sharpen with discrimination so surely some sort of separation is applied. As if “auto subject selection” has gone on in the software, separated subject from background for differential processing and then somehow the subject part has become offset. I just looking at my newly downloaded Version 3,3,1 in auto select model (out of focus, very blurry, auto parameters) and it almost looks like some sort of separation and subsequent shift of subject…possibly just the subject. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |